If the Warriors were seen as the bogeyman of the league just a few years ago, they owed it in large part to the prowess of Stephen Curry. But since this era is now over, a great debate around the superstar divides the web.

By winning the title in 2015 in Steve Kerr’s first year on their bench, the Warriors created a surprise. Most observers probably didn’t realize it at the time, but we were witnessing the beginnings of a true dynasty in the league. With Stephen Curry as a figurehead, the Dubs dominated the competition by accumulating 4 rings and reaching 6 Finals in the space of 7 years.

Led by the star leader, the Bay franchise has become one of the most popular in the world. But while his fanbase remains sizable today, his results leave much more to be desired. Should she therefore separate from the most legendary player in her history to rediscover the happiness she has known for so many years? This is the debate launched by Mark Willard on 95.7 The Game .

Big dilemma over the future of Steph Curry and the Warriors

I’d rather lose than see Steph Curry transferred… If you tell me now that Steph is going to end his career with the Warriors, but that means we won’t win any more rings for a decade… I’ll sign. It’s okay with me.

A necessarily subjective opinion on the part of the journalist, who has covered Golden State news for years. Moreover, some Internet users defend the opposite opinion:

I don’t agree with that.

So…do you enjoy making Curry suffer? That’s really selfish of a Warriors fan. You must want to see the players who wore the blue and gold jersey succeed while hoping that the team will sooner or later find its way to glory.

In clear loss of speed, the Warriors no longer seem able to play for the title in the future. Prisoner of this situation, should Stephen Curry leave his favorite franchise to hope to win again? Opinions differ.